Canada’s cities are facing a housing crisis. Homes are becoming increasingly unaffordable, pushing many residents to the fringes or out of the urban core altogether. But could a revolution in housing types be the answer?
Traditionally, Canadian suburbs have been dominated by single-family homes, while city centers boasted towering apartment buildings. This left a gap in the middle: a lack of options for families, young professionals, and retirees who don’t need the sprawl of a detached house but might find high-rises impersonal or isolating.
Enter the “missing middle”: housing options like townhouses, fourplexes (buildings with four units), and low-rise apartments. Proponents argue these densify neighborhoods without sacrificing character, creating a more vibrant mix of residents and income levels.
Toronto, for example, recently changed zoning laws to allow for more fourplexes. Vancouver is exploring ways to convert large single-family homes into multiple suites. These changes are driven by the belief that a wider variety of housing options can create a more equitable and sustainable city.
Opponents, however, raise concerns. Some fear the “missing middle” translates to bland, boxy buildings that disrupt the established feel of neighborhoods. Others worry about increased traffic and strain on local infrastructure. There’s also the question of affordability: will these new housing types actually be within reach for those struggling most?
The success of a housing revolution hinges on careful planning and community engagement. Architects argue that well-designed “missing middle” developments can be aesthetically pleasing and integrate seamlessly into existing neighborhoods. Additionally, ensuring a mix of unit sizes and price points is crucial to achieving true affordability.
The status quo is no longer sustainable. By embracing new housing options and prioritizing community input, Canadian cities have the potential to become more affordable, inclusive, and livable for all.
